Galery

3

2

1

Let me first say that these type of organizations believe that there should be crises. Even when there are none, they invent them. Historically, we can say that, in times of crisis, whether at European, national or international level, these organizations exist and operate. They use crises as a springboard or a reason for their existence.

However, let us put them aside and turn to the social movements that have no connection with the organizations and still express discontent. Currently in Britain, which is preparing for the Olympics next year, there is a proposal for the social movements of discontented citizens to be designated as terrorist organizations. This is something that "opens the gap" so much and it is dangerous for the future and the expression of social discontent by the European citizens.
 
The third is that there are now dozens of social movements of peaceful protesters worldwide, who are against the decisions of their governments for the economic crisis and many other issues, such as education, low wages, unemployment, etc. I am talking about movements such as Occupy Wall Street in the USA, Occupy City in Britain, in France, Greece, etc. They are too many already and they represent a new phenomenon. The point is that in the past, we have often witnessed how smaller organizations separate from inside the movement and resort to violence at a given time. They use weapons and become terrorist organizations. In this sense, it is not at all strange for alternative ways of expression to emerge, including murder. I think the most dangerous thing now is for the trend of these movements to illegalize the government. This should possibly draw our attention more seriously in the future.